The Capital City Assembly has delayed voting on today’s agenda due to concerns about achieving a quorum.

Insufficient councilors were present for the “Elections and Appointments” item.

Councilors from the Movement for Podgorica, namely Milos Krstic, Ranka Otašević, and Dragutin Vučinić, were absent from the assembly session, as noted by the local parliament president, Jelena Borovinić Bojović.

President Jelena Borovinić Bojović assured that updates regarding the continuation of the voting will be provided later.

Members of the Europe Now Movement and other ruling coalition partners engaged in discussions with councilors from the Party of European Progress and the Turnaround regarding the vote.

Councilor Srdjan Peric expressed to “Vijesti” his intention to remain until the “Nomination Elections” point. Additionally, European Union councilor Budimir Mugoša also confirmed to “Vijesti” that he would leave before the session concluded.

Paunović: Previous management of “Vodovod” misused a facility meant for employee rest

During the discussion on public, suburban, and rural water supply—delayed for nearly a decade due to non-compliance with the Law on Communal Activities—Mitar Paunović, the head of the Democrats’ club, highlighted significant issues.

He raised concerns about unregistered and unreported tobacco plantations, where some owners reportedly incur costs of several dozen euros for their maintenance, during the city and settlement water supply discussion.

Paunović also pointed out that a facility belonging to “Waterworks and Sewerage,” meant for employee rest, had been misappropriated by prior management. He noted an investment of 260.000 euros in its setup back in 2008, adding that it had been converted into “a second Vila Gorica.”

Councilor Mirza Krnić pleaded with the City to focus on improving conditions in settlements and addressing water shortages.

“Every issue necessitates a resolution. Not only what ‘Zelenilo’ has planted but also what the citizens require. A systematic approach to watering at the city level is essential,” he stated.

Klikovac: Concerns surrounding Capital City’s expenditure plan

According to Andrija Klikovac of the Democratic Party of Socialists (DPS), the Capital City aims to enhance its budget, noting that 56 percent of revenue was generated in just half the year. He remarked that revenue collections from the previous year fell short due to a sluggish private sector.

This was mentioned during a discussion on the Semi-Annual Report detailing total revenues and expenditures categorized by organizational, functional, and economic classifications.

“We have an issue with the Capital City’s spending plan. It requires a budget rebalance or over 50 million euros will need to be rolled over to 2026. I hope that the government councilors won’t claim it’s a commendable budget, as we are carrying over 50 million euros without providing citizens with better services,” he elaborated.

He indicated that expenditures were only realized at 30 percent. Further criticizing the lack of substance in the semi-annual report, he stated that the quantity of platitudes was concerning.

Stefan Ćulafić (DPS) echoed that the expenditure rate was merely 30 percent halfway through the year, suggesting that the City would not be able to maximize its funds by the end of 2025.

“When we assess the situation, 2022 was significantly more effective. This reveals a trend of regression that persists. Previous tasks that would take one or two months now extend to six,” he said.

Head of the European Union Club Miloš Maskovic emphasized that the semi-annual report supports claims that everything indicated is indeed being accomplished. He criticized the budget’s realism and pointed out delays arising from the political landscape.

“Donations accounted for a mere 1.7 million, while property sales stood at a modest 440.000 euros—just five percent of expectations. Capital investments managed to meet only 23 percent of their targets, and subsidies for social and economic programs remain a serious concern. We are aware of the City’s struggles with debt repayment and lawsuits. Notably, the Capital City allocated 80.000 euros for compensation related to dog bites,” he asserted.

He foresaw a necessary budget rebalance, pointing out the uncertainty regarding the construction of the wastewater treatment collector.

Councilor Srđan Perić from the Preokret movement cautioned against escalating costs, urging the City to respond promptly to prevent further increases.

Councilor Mirza Krnić reiterated the need for decisive solutions regarding urban, suburban, and rural water supply to alleviate shortages.

“Every issue requires resolution—not just those associated with ‘Zelenilo,’ but also those affecting the citizens. A systematic watering solution at the city level is crucial,” he reiterated.

Mujović: Careful responses to diplomatic overtures are essential

European Union councilor Budimir Mugoša expressed that rather than establishing a Vatican embassy, it would be far better to invest in two new schools costing five million euros each. He queried Mayor Saša Mujović about his familiarity with this initiative.

“It’s hard to believe you would agree to transfer a property valued at 10 million euros without conditions… This legal confusion is troubling—initial consent was given and subsequently revoked,” he stated.

Councillor of the Party of European Progress (SEP) Jelena Knežević commented on the establishment of official diplomatic relations between Montenegro and the Holy See in 2006, reminding colleagues that the Vatican was one of the first nations to support Montenegrin independence.

“We have a prosperous cultural and educational partnership, and it’s widely known that we maintain a representative in Rome. This decision is significant as it fosters religious dialogue,” Knežević emphasized.

Boban Radević (For the Future of Podgorica) disagreed with the notion of providing land “for free.”

“I see no logic in relinquishing such extensive land. Many individuals lack proper housing. Instead of focusing on behalf of socially vulnerable areas or young couples, we are sacrificing territory for diplomatic relations,” he voiced.

Leader of the Europe Now Movement (PES) councillors’ club Anđela Mićović indicated the necessity to consider current geopolitical shifts.

“This action represents a gesture of respect and confidence… Relations with the nunciature are legally international. Additionally, it’s a strategic investment… Crucially, the decision derives from state, not market interests—this land has not been utilized for public initiatives nor is it essential for our development. It exemplifies statesmanship grounded in national legislation and international relations,” she explained.

Mayor Saša Mujović clarified that this initiative has roots dating back to 2018, confirming that Montenegro’s Prime Minister recently visited the Vatican.

“Montenegro cannot dictate partnership choices. We must respond sagely to diplomatic gestures. To engage in larger political matters, we need to invest something. This aligns with broader political interests,” Mujović observed.

Perić: Increase compensation for local community leaders

The DPS councilors’ club has requested the Constitutional Court to assess the constitutionality of the Decision regarding the remuneration of Local Community Council presidents, according to club leader Andrija Klikovac.

He argued that this decision could lead to “confusion” among Podgorica’s residents.

“This cannot be executed in Podgorica. If found unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court, will you step down?” he questioned Sladjana Andjusic, Secretary of the Secretariat for Local Self-Government.

He insisted that the DPS won’t endorse this decision and noted his withdrawal from the working group due to its perceived unseriousness.

Preokret Movement councilor Srđan Perić highlighted the foundational role of local communities in democracy and criticized the salary of 100 euros for their presidents.

Perić discussed this during the Proposal for a Decision on Remuneration for Work discussion.

“These individuals have more responsibilities and travel demands than we do. Their operational expenses are real,” he advocated.

He considered even a 250-euro compensation modest, asserting it should come with amplified engagement and accountability from local community leaders.

“The amount being proposed is highly questionable,” remarked Perić.

Mayor Saša Mujović agreed that the 100-euro figure is minimal, suggesting that a higher amount—350 to 450 euros—might prompt accusations of party favoritism.

Perić emphasized the necessity of considering citizen input to energize local communities.

“Effort is required for progress,” he asserted.

City Parliament President Jelena Borovinić Bojović stated that the goal of amending the Rules of Procedure was to implement technical changes. She noted that changes to the Rules would again be necessary with amendments to the Law on Local Self-Government.

The new Rules indicate that the city parliament chairperson holds equivalent powers and duties as the president. Additionally, a city parliament member may propose forming working groups to tackle specific issues.

A notable update is that once approved by the Assembly, questions and responses from councilors will be published on the city parliament website.

Perić criticized the existing arbitrary decisions, perplexed as to why the government declines some proposals.

Klikovac: DPS proposes salary hikes for Agency for Construction and Development

Andrija Klikovac, leader of the DPS councilors’ club, reported that he thoroughly reviewed the work plan of the Agency for Construction and Development of Podgorica. He emphasized that DPS “left behind numerous projects and valuable staff at the Agency.”

“Our proposal pertains to personnel adjustments. A segment of the plan should focus on enhancing working conditions for all engineers within the Agency. There is a significant shortfall of civil engineers in the market… We need to ensure that construction site supervisors actively engage and not merely sign documents. A comprehensive development strategy for future operations is essential; we must link the Agency’s activities with the University of Montenegro (UCG). Also, the AND1 facility is deteriorating and losing value. Its rental income will significantly drop compared to prior periods,” Klikovac explained, stating that DPS would advocate for salary increases for employees at the Agency.

Mayor Saša Mujović expressed gratitude to Klikovac for the “valuable messages” directed to the Agency’s director To Bajko Vučićević.

“The AND1 location will be allocated to the Parliament of Montenegro to promote EU relations. By December, this area will be an exemplary and well-organized facility,” stated Mujović.

Vučićević concurred with Klikovac’s assertion regarding the Agency’s staff strengthening.

Mirza Krnić from the Preokret Movement emphasized the ambitious nature of the Agency’s plan but questioned the feasibility of its complete execution. He noted that the Agency is managing around 300 legal cases, highlighting the importance of knowing the classification and status of each case.

Vučićević replied that it would be premature to speculate on the Agency’s legal matters.

Krnić: Expanding Podgorica without a recovery plan

Klikovac raised concerns about planning existing projects amidst financial constraints. He criticized the late discussions regarding the Capital City’s Spatial Planning Program for the current year.

“The construction of Vojislavljevića Boulevard was announced on May 12th. The Traffic Administration informed the City that property and legal matters on that route remain unresolved and won’t be addressed in the upcoming six months. An alarming tender emerged, won by a furniture company, fortunately canceled before further complications arose, ensuring the boulevard wouldn’t take a decade to finish,” he explained.

He noted a substantial similarity between the current document and one prepared by former Agency director Dragan Senic, asserting that the current realization of the City’s capital budget for the first half of the year stands at “only 20 percent.”

“The project implementation level is alarmingly low. This document seems to list everything possible; however, actual ground execution remains dismal. This pattern of poor implementation has persisted for the second consecutive year,” Klikovac underscored, labeling the document problematic.

Mayor Saša Mujović remarked that he inherited a city not functioning optimally upon taking office.

“During my discussions with the Traffic Administration head, I discovered that no project is initiated without complete expropriation… Consider the ramifications had I forced work at any expense, leading to disastrous events like the Jaz Boulevard incident where infrastructure collapses could occur. Initiatives commenced timely, and I possess no hidden agendas…,” he assured.

Tamara Crnogorčić from the Europe Now Movement admonished Klikovac to align views concerning the previous Agency director, Dragan Senić, evaluating him as either beneficial or detrimental.

Klikovac countered that Senić was “effective in meeting criteria and collaborating well with the prior Mayor Oliver Injac

“Do not defend Ms. Injac. Regarding this program, it’s being finalized too late; it shouldn’t ever happen again,” he commented.

Stefan Ćulafić (DPS) noted that one of the two significant documents is currently under debate in the assembly.

“Timing affects the context drastically. Passing in May is a different matter from waiting until the final deadline. The next opportunity would be September. There’s no justification for this delay; the necessity of timely discussions is vital. This seems to stem from political maneuvering, and this plan appears excessively ambitious and unrealistic. Failing to meet 50 percent of this by June 13, 2027, would be disheartening for Podgorica’s citizens,” he expressed.

The slow implementation of key projects will incur significant costs for Podgorica’s residents.

Ksenija Aranitović, an opposition DPS councilor, expressed dissatisfaction over the incomplete expropriation of the Vojislavljević Boulevard segment.

Mirjana Radulović (DPS) emphasized the importance of city operations continuing, criticizing the late introduction of issues that should have been addressed months prior.

“The areas in question lack clarified ownership status and still rely on temporary septic systems. A similar scenario exists in Zabjelo behind the former ‘Titeks’ facility, where construction activity is rampant,” she noted.

Preokret councilor Srđan Perić expressed concerns that “the current administration appears unaware of the challenges facing capital city development,” calling for reflection on the rampant construction trends.

“We face procedural problems, as simplistic actions shouldn’t be seen as solutions. The Rehabilitation Plan lacks preventive measures against spatial damages… even though the cause for disruptions may differ, the responses are alarmingly insufficient,” assessed Perić, stressing the need for a comprehensive rehabilitation plan.

Miloš Mašković (European Alliance) commented that “what happened to Mujović at Gorica was deserved.” Addressing councilor Mitra Šušić (NSD), he critiqued his defense of the mayoral conduct during citizen protests.

“I would refrain from commenting on the citizens’ expressions of dissatisfaction,” he added.

The head of the PES councilors’ club, Anđela Mićović, called out Mašković for exhibiting disrespect towards an esteemed university professor, insisting he reconsider his actions.

“Do you not possess a sense of political decency? You are a young student. Through your actions, you tarnish the role of a student,” she remarked.

Mašković responded that he had adapted to writing hesitantly, suggesting there was no need for further victimization of Mr. Mujović.

Mujović asserted that Mašković had also criticized the European Union member Miloš Đuričković for expressing disappointment in Gorica.

“Nonetheless, I extend my wishes for success, despite you being unworthy of a response. The hatred you harbor will consume you. Despite being young, do not allow that to transpire,” he admonished.

Mašković retorted that Mujović had “brought the office of the mayor into disrepute.”

“I am ashamed to see you in that role. You exemplify inappropriate behavior as a university professor,” he concluded.

Đuričković expressed confusion regarding the mayor’s negative disposition towards the European Union.

“The message was clear: your speech in Gorica was not welcomed, and that sentiment was shared with the gathered citizens. The interaction that day conveyed dissatisfaction, not personal grievances against you; it symbolized broader discontent with political policies in Podgorica,” he stated.

Mujović recounted having dismissed advice to avoid speech-making at the Partisan Fighter Monument, suggesting adherence to community advice would have been more prudent.

Preokret councilor Mirza Krnić informed that resolving property rights issues is projected to cost the city 82 million euros, linked to future projects.

“Podgorica is growing, but it lacks a recovery plan or vision. Future generations will bear the burden of expropriations… We miss a vision for quality living standards—extensive boulevards and parks are essential,” lamented Krnić.

Perić: Local government term shortened without consent

Perić questioned Mujović and local parliament president Jelena Borovinić Bojović about the implications of the current government’s mandate being reduced by one-and-a-half years.

“Local self-governance remains disregarded. The central government lacks authority to withhold our rights. Silencing us through political majority consensus diminishes our autonomy,” he remarked.

Recently, with the backing of 67 members of the Parliament of Montenegro, a proposal passed to standardize local elections for all municipalities on June 13, 2027.

Borovinić Bojović claimed the majority of councilors showed no concern about their shortened terms.

“This aligns with a greater objective. There were efforts made for legal realignment… Some consultations occurred, albeit limited to the community of municipalities,” she explained, adding “the overarching aim pertains to state interests.”

Borovinić Bojović: Immediate discussion about Sofija Klikovac’s name is imperative

The session at the Capital City Assembly, as articulated by local parliament president Jelena Borovinić Bojović, noted the absence of Movement for Podgorica councilors—Miloš Krstić, Ranka Otašević, and Dragutin Vučinić.

Mujović stressed the urgency for councilors to expedite the naming of the preschool institution after Sofija Klikovac, emphasizing that a delay until September could hinder its establishment.

“We must prioritize the public interest. We can alternatively consider holding two sessions in August to pass this agenda item and ensure timely operations for the preschool,” proposed Mujović.

Klikovac affirmed their commitment to adhere to the local parliament’s Rules of Procedure, stating, “We publicly support naming the institution after Sofija Klikovac. However, we need clarity on pertinent documents. Major decisions should not be made without proper councilor briefing,” he stressed.

Mašković cautioned against violating the Rules of Procedure, stating that doing so could set a precedent for future agenda items being pushed through similarly.

New Serbian Democracy (NSD) councilor Mitar Šušić suggested that administrative oversights should be forgiven on this occasion.

Borovinić Bojović noted an understanding of both sides’ perspectives but acknowledged that an administrative lapse had led to this situation.

“I do not advocate for frequent changes or violations of the Rules of Procedure; we must respect protocol in most cases, except when handling exceptionally strategic matters. There are valid arguments on both sides. We must navigate whether to sacrifice the process or not,” she concluded.

Klikovac (DPS) reasserted that the Rules of Procedure ought to be respected legally, assuring that opposition councilors would attend the next emergency session to vote on this matter.

The local parliament president stated that she will arrange a special session in early August to discuss and potentially approve the naming of the preschool after Sofija Klikovac.

News